Abstract:
Injuries on the football field are expected, but the sport on the sidelines has been shown to be riskier than you might think. ...
Originally posted byExFrog
Headline: "Cheerleaders fly high despite risks of injury"
vs.
Quote: "We can have an athlete or a cheerleader standing on someone's shoulders but they're not to be tossed in the air," Kull said.
So, the headline is accurate how? Do editors read the articles first?
As a former TCU cheerleader, it's sad that they aren't allowed to follow the rules that other teams follow. There are restrictions already in place and we had no major injuries when I cheered there. I don't know how it's been since then but when you look at how many catastrophic injuries football players have, I think the focus may be misdirected or sexist. Not to say that there aren't male cheerleaders, but no one really focuses on them when these reports come out. So, for comparison's sake, how many males were catastrophically injured over that same 25 year span, and why do the stats have to point out "of female athletes"? Ever heard of Title 9? Equality?
Originally posted byCertifiedCheer
Here are some examples of colleges displaying male flying techniques:
The following link is Navarro College. At 0:30 you will see their basket toss section highlighting male basket tosses. At 0:48 their pyramid section exemplifies multiple pyramids with males-holding males-holding females (as described in the previous comment).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaBzLokxLpQ&feature=related
The following link is Hawaii Pacific University. At 1:10 you will see basket tosses performed by male cheerleaders. At 1:28 you can see the pyramids described in the previous comment,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVGbEI7XXOc
ExFrog
posted 9/05/08 @ 1:41 PM CST
vs.
Quote: "We can have an athlete or a cheerleader standing on someone's shoulders but they're not to be tossed in the air," Kull said.
So, the headline is accurate how? Do editors read the articles first?
As a former TCU cheerleader, it's sad that they aren't allowed to follow the rules that other teams follow. There are restrictions already in place and we had no major injuries when I cheered there. I don't know how it's been since then but when you look at how many catastrophic injuries football players have, I think the focus may be misdirected or sexist. Not to say that there aren't male cheerleaders, but no one really focuses on them when these reports come out. So, for comparison's sake, how many males were catastrophically injured over that same 25 year span, and why do the stats have to point out "of female athletes"? Ever heard of Title 9? Equality?